💻 Dev & Engineering
15 bookmarks
Fishmarketacad (@FishMarketAcad)
📅 Jun 22, 2025 · ❤️ 66 · 👁 6,065
Hot take: The more i vibe code, the more disappointed I get by AI's lack of problem solving common sense.
Basically if you're inexperienced, read widely and understand fundamentals so you can guide it better. AI is lacking in common sense solutions, for now.
For now, when prompting, remember to ask it to read cursor rules and here are some cursor rules which helped me involving a project which had a database. I made a new chat with this rule and it gave a simple solution instead of suggesting a complex fix.
Feel free to edit and it may not work for you.
Cursor Rules:
BEFORE ANY SOLUTION - MANDATORY DATA INVENTORY
YOU MUST FIRST:
1. List ALL existing data structures/tables/collections in the system
2. For each data structure, write what data it contains
3. Ask: "What data do I already have that relates to this problem?"
4. Ask: "Can I solve this by combining/querying existing data differently?"
5. If database exists and problem is about duplicates/persistence: "Should I track this in the database?"
ONLY AFTER completing the data inventory can you propose solutions.
🚨 MANDATORY SIMPLICITY-FIRST APPROACH 🚨
STOP - REQUIRED FORMAT BEFORE ANY SOLUTION
Before writing ANYTHING, you MUST answer these 4 questions in this exact format:
- EXISTING DATA CHECK: "Can I solve this by querying what's already in their system?"
- 5-MINUTE FIX: "If I had 5 minutes to fix this, I would..."
- DUMBEST SOLUTION: "The most boring/obvious approach is..."
- BASIC OPERATION: "This is just a simple [database query/if statement/function call]"
PATTERN RECOGNITION: COMMON SIMPLE SOLUTIONS
User says: "Multiple X are happening"
IF DATABASE EXISTS: Check if X already happened in database, if yes, skip it
IF NO DATABASE: Check if X already happened in memory, if yes, skip it
DON'T think: Complex deduplication algorithms, time windows
User says: "I want to filter/categorize"
IMMEDIATELY think: Add simple if/else check or database flag
DON'T think: AI systems, complex categorization engines
User says: "This happens too often"
IMMEDIATELY think: Add simple frequency check or database timestamp
DON'T think: Rate limiting systems, complex scheduling
User says: "I need to track Y"
IF DATABASE EXISTS: Store Y in database with timestamp
IF NO DATABASE: Store Y in memory/file
DON'T think: Complex tracking systems, analytics frameworks
🚨 RED FLAGS - STOP IMMEDIATELY IF YOU'RE THINKING:
- ❌ "System design" / "Architecture" / "Framework"
- ❌ "Multiple phases" / "Complex workflows"
- ❌ "Complex algorithms" / "State machines" / "Analytics frameworks"
- ❌ "In-memory solutions when database exists for persistence problems"
✅ GREEN FLAGS - DEFAULT TO THESE:
- ✅ "Query existing database" / "Check if already exists"
- ✅ "Add simple database table/collection for tracking"
- ✅ "Store this value" / "Skip if already done"
- ✅ "Simple timestamp check" / "Basic flag/field"
CRITICAL: THIS RULE OVERRIDES ALL OTHER INSTINCTS
YOUR DEFAULT MINDSET:
"What's the most boring, obvious, straightforward way to solve this using what already exists?"
PRODUCTION SYSTEM REALITY:
- User wants minimal risk, maximum benefit
- Simple solutions are easier to debug and maintain
- Perfect is the enemy of good
- 5-minute fixes beat 5-hour architecture changes
- If database exists, use it for persistence problems (it's the simple solution)
DUPLICATE/PERSISTENCE PROBLEMS + DATABASE EXISTS = USE DATABASE
- Multiple notifications/processing = Add tracking table
- "Same thing happening multiple times" = Database deduplication
- Any persistence needed = Database, not memory
📂 Also in: 🤖 AI & Agents, 📚 Books & Reading, ⚡ Productivity & Self-Improvement
Paweł Huryn (@PawelHuryn)
📅 May 4, 2025 · ❤️ 2,394 · 👁 327,809
I see abstract AI agent architectures everywhere.
But no one explains how to build them in practice.
Here's a practical guide to doing it with n8n: 🧵 https://t.co/b18DtBLq39
📂 Also in: 🤖 AI & Agents
Alex Albert (@alexalbert__)
📅 Apr 21, 2025 · ❤️ 4,928 · 👁 622,396
We wrote up what we've learned about using Claude Code internally at Anthropic.
Here are the most effective patterns we've found (many apply to coding with LLMs generally): https://t.co/5SOqS019ny
📂 Also in: 🤖 AI & Agents
Aadit Sheth (@aaditsh)
📅 Apr 16, 2025 · ❤️ 19,418 · 👁 1,159,375
Stanford literally packed 1.5 hours with everything you need to know about LLMs https://t.co/TpEH9yUEy0
Aadit Sheth (@aaditsh)
📅 Apr 12, 2025 · ❤️ 4,114 · 👁 296,448
This guy literally breaks down every AI coding rule in under 15 minutes. Save this.
https://t.co/AGidX7qdx4
📂 Also in: 🤖 AI & Agents
matt palmer (@mattyp)
📅 Apr 11, 2025 · ❤️ 3,112 · 👁 289,769
A checklist for secure vibe coded apps.
Putting things on the internet is kind of like parking your car in San Francisco—there's inherent risk. 😅
Luckily, there are some straightforward things you can do to minimize those risks. Here are 16 simple things to make secure vibe coded apps. 👇
TechStockFundamentals (@TechFundies)
📅 Jul 9, 2024 · ❤️ 468 · 👁 359,564
Contact worked at $GOOGL Waymo in charge of strategic automotive partnerships.
Pretty positive on Waymo tech but highlights difficulty of scaling roll-outs which is necessary to get costs down. Was pretty constructive on sustainability of $UBER model and their advantage in not owning a fleet (w/ ability to flex it up and down based on pricing).
Highlights
-Worked w/ auto OEMs to modify vehicle platforms for Waymo. Worked closely w/ Waymo fleet ops teams to understand their requirements. Also spent time working on parcel good delivery, and shippers who ran major parcel networks to explore autonomous use cases – overlapped w/ robotaxis bc considered delivery as way to increase robotaxi yield.
-Waymo autonomous tech works – they have it solved. Cars are completely autonomous.
-Doesn’t see Waymo as direct threat to Uber. Initial Waymo goal was to get 50% share in any given market but then realized difficult of scaling / running a robotaxi fleet. Hard to compete w/ UBER cost per mile bc of their model which lacks a dedicated fleet. Can dynamically price to pull in supply which is incredible.
-Waymo can offer services that Uber cannot. For instance – multi-stops for errands are much easier and people don’t mind having a robot wait for them as opposed to a human.
-Thinks Waymo goal is to license the tech bc it is great and then can be applied to multiple applications. Running a robotaxi service is a means to an end. Good news is that US really has 5-8 cities that are bulk of ridesharing [not sure that’s correct?]
-Difficult to scale tech across vehicle platforms – really have to spend a lot of money and make big bets on a vehicle platform because need to get huge volume to get costs down in terms of parts. Auto industry wants to make millions of units while Waymo needs thousands of units – just hard to get economics of scale.
-Waymo car cost is over $100k. To get a purpose built vehicle from OEM is $1b vehicle program – so instead work w/ existing platforms. Even modifying existing cars is very expensive – have to run wiring, new software functionality in vehicle, redundant breaking / steering / battery / etc. bc is autonomous.
-Fleet operations also expensive – need to build out charging infrastructure – can take a couple years to get electricity needed for a location. Need staff to go get broken cars and repair them.
-Think Waymo yield is less than 50% which is why they are partnering w/ Uber for food delivery etc.
-Waymo needs to figure out how to get more applications which can increase yield which can increase volume of cars which can get cost / car down.
-Believe Waymo financial breakeven is far away.
-LiDAR tech isn’t expensive but making it work is. Have to build and maintain high-definition maps, sensor cleaning is more involved, sensors break, etc.
-Wayve has great funding and is doing a good job. Still work to do – not as smooth, choppy, runs red lights, etc. Really good people and think in great position.
-Uber: Thinks they can potentially run own autonomous fleets to augment network. Can take payout to drivers and easily route that into tech spend once it is ready. Also worth noting Waymo currently can’t operate in really bad weather.
-Hard to sell Waymos to public to operate. They only work in designated areas and Waymo wouldn’t want liability of car being in hands of consumer. This use case is just too far out.
-More bullish on trucking and maybe even delivery. Think robotaxi at scale much further out.
📂 Also in: 📚 Books & Reading, ⚡ Productivity & Self-Improvement
Ash (@ahboyash)
📅 Jul 8, 2024 · ❤️ 842 · 👁 219,467
Token listing strategy playbook
📔 Founders especially, save this if you are planning to launch a token soon.
When discussing portfolio value add, it’s not just making introductions to other VCs/angels to fill up the fundraising round but actually getting hands-on with founders to devise a proper strategy for success. One of it includes a proper token listing strategy on trusted centralised exchanges (CEX).
Here is a high-level guide I’ve written to help you and your project navigate the murky waters of getting your token listed on a major CEX.
I’ll break it down into 5 sections:
• Token listing documents
• CEX and market maker negotiations
• Community
• Media coverage
• Misc
Before diving deeper, it is imperative to have a good fundraising plan before launching a token strategy.
Make sure you nail the following:
• Carve out a budget to pay for exchange listing fees (gets higher in a bull market) and market making (retainer) fees.
• Strategise on how to fundraise from the venture arm of large CEXes (@BinanceLabs, @cbventures, @OKX_Ventures) as it improves the chances of listing.
• Build relationships with VCs/ angels who have strong connections in the industry.
- Token listing documents
In anticipation of a token launch, projects will need to prepare a few documents beforehand and they are the main requirements for a CEX listing.
This includes:
• A well written whitepaper (detailing the project’s vision and mission, explaining the protocol mechanism, team, roadmap).
• Tokenomics (token details, utility, vesting schedule, sustainable distribution).
• Protocol security and token audit from a trusted audit provider.
• Legal documents (entity documents, legal opinion from a lawyer).
• Investment and fundraising documents (last valuation raised at, cap table).
• Completed CEX listing forms (each CEX will have its own unique token listing form to fill up —> generally includes company incorporation, financial data, team, tokenomics, protocol mechanism, community and traction, legal documents).
- CEX and market maker negotiations
(a) CEX
These days, every CEX listing involves a listing fee and these varies from paying in stablecoin USD terms to giving out a % of the token total supply. From our discussions, expect to pay a fee between $200k - $500k (sometimes more) or give out 5-20% of total token supply.
Apart from listing fees, projects can also be expected to pay for technical fees (audit, token integration), marketing fees and security deposits.
There is a backlog on every CEX now as more and more projects vie for a token listing. Building relationships + connections with the right people can expedite your success.
It is also crucial for founders to apply for listings on multiple CEXes to increase the chances of securing a token listing + use it for negotiations. Good to have a collaboration + marketing campaign with DeFi wallets of various CEXes for more eyeballs.
(b) Market Makers (MM)
Onboarding MMs is a necessary part of the listing process to maintain price stability and ensure healthy liquidity for the token.
MMs typically fall into 2 categories:
• Loan + option model: MM borrow tokens from the project to provide liquidity and are granted call options (the right to purchase the token at a cheaper price)
• Retainer + profit share model: project pay the MM monthly fees to maintain liquidity
@0xLouisT and @minjung_eth did some good research on MMs:
• https://t.co/5nOK7HTyIl
• https://t.co/hFUo85Q9zS
- Community and socials
Form a strong (almost cult-like) and engaged community who will serve as your first set of users and word of mouth marketers.
Some tips:
• Discord <> Telegram/WeChat <> Twitter —> nail the trifecta of social media.
• Hire good community managers to manage Discord and Telegram groups, ecosystem/ BD leads to secure partnerships and localisation strategies (e.g. APAC lead/ head of marketing in Korea).
• Be active on Twitter from the main account + founder’s account to keep users informed with project updates + evangelise the product. Bonus if the project has a dedicated intern account/shitposter to get maximum mindshare (@intern <> @monad_xyz, @HugoMartingale <> @Polymarket).
• Integrate with major questing platforms for another source of GTM (e.g. @Galxe, @zealy_io and @layer3) and building communities.
• Founders need to be constantly evangelising their project and be excited about what they are building. (Study @keoneHD <> @monad_xyz, @Punk9277 <> @_kaitoai, @SmokeyTheBera <> @berachain, @taran <> @stix).
• Airdrops to power users + making them rich is one of the best ways to form a loyal set of users (albeit a bit hard these days with industrial farms and sybils).
- Media coverage
Crypto Twitter (CT) is inundated daily with memes, shitposts, charts, project updates, threads. Projects need a well-designed + comprehensive marketing plan to ensure all angles are adequately covered.
High level strats:
• Publishing on major crypto news portals to get maximum coverage from publications like @TheBlock__, @Foresight_News, @BlockBeatsAsia and @panews.
• KOL marketing which usually involves paid promotion or letting them invest at a lower valuation in exchange for marketing content (threads, articles, videos, channel shoutout).
• Outsourcing to top tier marketing agencies. Some of the good ones I have had the pleasure of working with includes @snow949494, @cryptofreedman <> @hypepartners, @JiraiyaReal <> @TailoredWeb3, @ciaobelindazhou <> @ShardDXB.
• Publishing deep research articles: apart from the big bois like @Delphi_Digital, @MessariCrypto, @blockworksres, there are many high quality firms that can be used like @Ian_Unsworth <> @kairos_res, @Steve_4P <> @FourPillarsFP, @blocmates, @asxn_r and @Shoalresearch.
- Misc
• @coingecko / @CoinMarketCap token listing.
• @dexscreener enhanced token information.
• @DefiLlama project listing.
• @DuneAnalytics dashboards to showcase relevant on-chain metrics and user analysis.
• @DeBankDeFi supported protocol.
• @tokenterminal data partnership.
I'll caveat this by saying that every token launch is unique and a cookie-cutter approach is usually NGMI.
A successful launch obviously involves way more than what I’ve covered here - this is just the tip of the iceberg.
If you’re working on a new project and want to learn more about the ins and outs of launching a token, feel free to reach out to @signum_capital or myself as we’re always looking to back bullish founders. Can’t leak too much alpha here :)
📂 Also in: ⛓️ Crypto & Web3, 🚀 Startup & Business
david phelps (@divine_economy)
📅 Mar 27, 2024 · ❤️ 74 · 👁 17,800
Crypto Consumer Company Idea #2:
Permissionless Game Shows
For a few days each year, we all get excited about crypto consumer for one reason:
Game shows.
Mad Realities. Love on Leverage. Crypto the Game.
The challenge has been letting anyone make these sustainably.
Until now.
Imagine this. It’s a few years from now, and a protocol wants to run its own version of Shark Tank as a new kind of hackathon: one where its community tunes in to vote on their favorite projects.
The winning projects get huge rewards, the losing projects get recognition and onchain credentials for making it so far, and the audience at home gets points from both the chain and from every project they vote for.
Both contestants and voters pay in—because it’s worth it to them for the money, status, opportunities, social connections, and potential airdrops they all earn. And that lets game show creators earn big in a way they never could before.
Now imagine bigger. Survivor. The Voice. American Idol. The Bachelor. Love Island. All giving contestants and new ways to earn reputation, to earn rewards, and to collaborate socially.
Or think even bigger than that. A monetizable Product Hunt. Presidential Debates with an audience live-voting on responses. The Grammies and Oscars with audiences picking who wins.
Any creator could have game shows for their fans to decide who they partner with. What track they release. What’s the most persuasive case they can make for future trends.
And all of this would be built on financial and reputational rails for everyone to earn.
Which is to say:
All of this can only be done onchain.
And as of this week, it can be done right now through us at @jokerace_io. By anyone. Without needing to worry about a single line of code.
There’s a lot of reasons this wasn’t possible before now—high gas fees, high overhead for managing the tech, and challenges letting anyone pay in to vote—but the main one is that it’s been hard to offer meaningful rewards for everyone involved in a game show.
In game shows, there’s literally some reward that’s at stake. That reward is usually financial: you get prize money. Sometimes, it’s reputational: you want the status of winning or backing a winner. And on rare occasions, it’s social: you form a community with others to back a favorite candidate. The best game shows will often integrate elements of financial, reputational, and social rewards all at once.
A game show without any rewards at all is a fairly doomed category, and we have a name for this cursed vertical in crypto: governance. In a sense, governance is just a game show without incentives or rewards, and yet in an industry built on incentives and rewards, we’ve insisted that the only types of decisions that anyone can make onchain are rewardless governance. Why? You might argue that rewards corrupt the integrity of the decision (maybe), but the real answer is because we haven’t wanted to do anything onchain that would enable these rewards in the first place.
It wasn’t until last week, when fees fell over 100x with EIP 4844, that it started to become sustainable to run social processes onchain in the land of ethereum. It wasn’t until this week that there was a way for anyone to participate in voting onchain with our introduction of anyone-can-vote at @jokerace_io.
So this is first week that it’s even been feasible to build game shows like the ones above.
And now that it’s cheap and fast to operate onchain, we can see the rewards for running onchain game shows are, indeed, huge.
Let me break that down a bit deeper to show how wild this opportunity is for all parties: the contestants, the viewers, and the game show creator.
First, and most obviously, contestants can earn from winning. A recurring show might give rewards to all players and teams on a given night, including the lowest-ranking ones that get eliminated.
That seems clear enough, but let me emphasize: contestants can also earn from losing. Even if the losers earn nothing, they still earn onchain reputation.
Every single person who votes for a contestant is attesting that they liked them. That’s a powerful social graph of permissionless data that the contestants can leverage for future communities, job opportunities, status, social connections, and, yes, airdrops. (If you won on karaoke night, a music project could do worse than to airdrop you its token.)
Imagine running all tiers of a game shows—votes to decide the contestants, votes to decide the finalists, votes to decide the winners. The reputation that everyone earns will create powerful graphs of proof-of-value, a far more meaningful metric than proof-of-humanity to help individuals find the ecosystems where we’re most valued.
Second, audience members can also earn. American gambling rules restrict payouts to voters of winning contestants, but it’s possible to imagine betting opportunities, bribes, and rewards overseas.
And what about in America? Voters might still earn other way. For example, they could earn NFTs, tokens, or points every time they vote. The fees they pay to vote could be used to buy up a token. They might even be able to swap or sell their voting rights (not financial advice).
But again, they’d earn reputationally and socially no matter what. Imagine voting for a no-name contestant who later became a celebrity and being able to prove you not only helped discover them but propel them to glory.
Imagine you were able to develop friends around this contestant who you could reach around the world. And imagine all of this entitled you, once again, to future communities, status, social connections, and airdrops. The social graph alone for measuring shared tastes among users could become the most valuable protocol for building a friendship or dating app in existence.
And then, most importantly, the contest creators earn. And they can earn three ways:
I. Data.
By operating onchain, creators will be able to access onchain information about their participants—what DeFi protocols they use, what NFTs they buy, what communities they’ve joined.
The simplest way to leverage this data is for sponsorships. For example, @rehashweb3, which runs a regular mini-game show onchain on @jokreace_io to decide who will appear on its podcast, recently worked with @bellosights to determine that 20% of their users were @zerion users. That insight was enough to get Zerion to sponsor their whole season.
But this data can be massively useful in other ways. It can let creators understand their community’s values. It can give them leverage to draw other players and judges to the show who are provably popular in their community. And it can incentivize other game shows, products, and protocols to want to reward anyone who participated as well.
All of this represents a huge unlock for the show’s growth.
II. Tokenization.
Perhaps you need the token to vote. Perhaps voting entitles you to buy the token. Perhaps voting entitles you to get an airdrop for the token. Perhaps paying to vote serves to purchase you the token. Perhaps the token is just used to select the contestants who will appear on the show. Or perhaps the token is just used for the final round.
Endless gamification is possible to support a token for the project.
III. Directly from show itself.
Most importantly, contest creators can monetize directly from the show they run. In a game show with 1000 contestants and thousands of dollars in prizes, they might conceivably charge $10-20 per entry and make a few thousand dollars.
But in a game show with 8 contestants and tens of thousands of voters, they could let anyone pay per vote—say, $1 per vote—and potentially make far more. And that’s for a single episode with a relatively small viewership.
Now imagine how this can scale over time. As the contest creator raises the prices to play, they can use this money to offer bigger rewards. Bigger rewards can then justify higher prices to pay, and so on. Over the course of a few years, they can scale up the financial incentives exponentially—and sustainable.
Imagine this at scale, and creators are making millions.
I’m excited that this is what we’ve been building for two years at @jokerace_io—a way for anyone to run these contests. Game shows are just one use case, but they’re a major one: when @eigencloud featured eight contestants to pick as their next supported LST, they got tens of thousands of voters paying in to participate.
You can imagine what this would look like at scale for something like, say, Miss Bumbum: the Brazilian beauty pageant for “best buttocks” that’s gotten more than 2 million voters for a given contest.
What would (may God forgive me) Miss Bumbum look like onchain? Well, the incredible thing is that this wasn’t even possible until this week—not only because of low gas fees, but because we’re the first contest tool that has ever let anyone vote. Until now, letting anyone vote would have been a recipe for random bots to give random number of votes.
But when you build on monetary rails that let you charge per vote, you can open up contests to anyone, proportionate to how they pay. And given the potential rewards, as well as the fun of playing, people stand to pay in substantially—if you design your mechanics well.
Of course, part of the mechanics means building a strong social brand, livestreaming with platforms like @unlonely_app, and taking time to align incentives for everyone involved. Creating a good game show is not easy.
But this week, it at least became easier. Because if you make one—and really, anyone can make one today—you can build a whole business of your own in consumer social on blockchains.
Without writing a single line of code.
This is my second in a series of posts on entire consumer social businesses you can build on top of @jokerace_io — the first was on gamified hackathons. If you’re interested in building any of these, my dms are open, and I’d love to be in touch.
https://t.co/JRnRC1Jml9
thanks to @seanmc_eth, @ddwchen, @medeana, @winnyeth, @reka_eth, @daisandconfused, @bdguan, @gracewhiteguan @DevinLewtan for all their feedback and insight
📂 Also in: ⛓️ Crypto & Web3, 🚀 Startup & Business, 📚 Books & Reading, ⚡ Productivity & Self-Improvement, 🧠 Philosophy & Poetry
yuga.eth 🛡 (@yugacohler)
📅 Sep 17, 2023 · ❤️ 1,759 · 👁 976,298
With respect, I found @ErikVoorhees' keynote to be jejune, anti-democratic, and disingenuous. It may be effective as a rallying cry for libertarians, but as a strategic framework for the global adoption of crypto, it is so divorced from reality as to be worthy of ignoring.
The speech's strongest points centered around the notion that "code is better than law." There is merit to the claim that transparent, mathematically-based rule-making can yield superior results to an opaque, politically-based process. I also agree with his characterization of the right to transact as fundamental to human existence.
However, I disagree with the perspective that American democracy is so deserving of disdain as to be rejected. Voorhees' conflation of the "state" as a single entity ignores the variety of political systems across the world and their relative levels of freedom. Democracy is categorically better than totalitarianism, and to reduce both to the machinations of men with "dead eyes and weak hearts" is to deny millennia of political progress, as well as the suffering of those under more oppressive regimes than the one Voorhees himself is subject to.
Voorhees' political framework reveals a level of hypocrisy and immediately crumbles when applied to the real world. Does he not comply with the subpoenas issued to him by the regulators he calls out in the audience? Does he not pay the income taxes that he castigates at the beginning of the speech? Would he have the creation of roads, bridges, and highways mediated through smart contracts today? There is a place for decentralized finance; there is also a place for the actions of a centralized state on behalf of its people, and to deny that is childish.
Voorhees says: "The political class... that legion of bureaucrats suckling at the teat of plundered wealth, with all their ornaments of authority, with all their hubris masked as confidence, with the inauthenticity of their smiles matched only by the absurdity of their ideas, and I see no reason to submit to the permissions under which they seek to restrain me. To such people, we owe nothing."
The reality is that Voorhees - and all of us - do submit to these permissions because we recognize the rule of law under a democratic system, arrived at through voting and lawmaking. The process is never perfect; it can even be corrupt; yet, we comply because we have faith that the inclusive political institutions that propelled America to become the financial hegemon will eventually recognize the importance and utility of crypto. It is reasonable and just to seek the consent – i.e., the permission – of the governed; that is democracy.
I strongly question a strategy which alienates all those involved in government as weak-willed and immoral. What does painting with such a broad brush achieve beyond revealing your own biases? In government, like in crypto, there are good people and bad people. We should aim to excise the bad people and have the good people in both spheres work together towards an open, global financial system.
I have much respect for Voorhees as an OG of crypto, and I understand that his perspective is a large part of how crypto came to be as big as it is today. But it is an untenable perspective weighed down by its idealism, dogmatism, and hyperbole and will slow down the adoption of crypto as we approach its next phase of global adoption.
To wholly reject the democratic state is libertarian propaganda and is of no use for the growth of crypto as an open, global financial system. We should instead recognize the merits of democracy and use them to further expand the reach of crypto.
📂 Also in: ⛓️ Crypto & Web3, 🚀 Startup & Business, 📚 Books & Reading, ⚡ Productivity & Self-Improvement
Benji (@0xFunk)
📅 Jun 6, 2022 · ❤️ 1,475
1/ Understanding the EVM – Simplified
You’ve probably heard of the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), but if you’re like me find it more than slightly intimidating. Below is my attempt at a basic guide to what it is and how it works:
📂 Also in: ⛓️ Crypto & Web3
Blake Burge (@blakeaburge)
📅 Oct 30, 2021 · ❤️ 31,810
Google Sheets isn't Excel...
But it's more powerful than you think.
8 things Google Sheets can do, you'll wish you knew yesterday. 📊
📂 Also in: ⚡ Productivity & Self-Improvement
Michael Saylor (@saylor)
📅 May 13, 2021 · ❤️ 18,204
Bitcoin Mining serves as the foundation of the monetary network - critical to its growth, stability, longevity, vitality, & integrity. The Proof of Work architecture is a masterpiece of engineering that anchors the system to the real world, providing Seven Layers of Security.
📂 Also in: ⛓️ Crypto & Web3, 🚀 Startup & Business
ian // (@ianDAOs)
📅 Dec 5, 2020 · ❤️ 3,704
How I learned Solidity programming in a month:
In April during lockdowns, I decided to invest in learning Solidity. Given that I haven't seriously coded beyond HTML in almost 20 years, it was daunting 😨
But it doesn't have to be hard or scary to get started.
Here's how 👇
📂 Also in: ⛓️ Crypto & Web3
Jake Brukhman (@jbrukh)
📅 Nov 17, 2019 · ❤️ 31
Ethereum smart contract folks, what’s the recommended way of downloading a snapshot of all the ERC-20 token balances for all holders of a particular token? cc @jeffscottward @izqui9 @AFDudley0 @Steven_McKie @Arjun_Bhuptani @ameensol @nanexcool
📂 Also in: ⛓️ Crypto & Web3